road to knowhere

Posts tagged journalism

Congratulations IPA winners

I got an award from the Illinois Press Association for third place in best single page design! I believe that was for this guy:

My co-worker beat me out with second place in the same category, our supervisor got himself an honorable mention for best informational graphic, and we got a whole slew of other awards this year. As soon as I heard, I went through this lengthy list of winners (PDF link at bottom). I might have smiled a bit at how many names I recognized — colleagues at my current job, people I studied journalism with in college, people I worked with at The Daily Illini and even in a couple cases oddly recognizable last names tipping me off through Facebook stalkerdom that I was a couple degrees separation away from them.

I smiled because most of the people I went to school with got out of newspapers (and understandably so). Also, many of those who are still in it I only see through Facebook, Twitter, their blogs or other side projects. But there are still quite a few in this state making a living in this business, and apparently producing some quality stuff. So congratulations to you all!

website, not Web site?!?!?!

Yesterday, @APStylebook made a monumentally attention-grabbing tweet:

Responding to reader input, we are changing Web site to website. This appears on Stylebook Online today and in the 2010 book next month.

Initially I thought I was reading @FakeAPStylebook, the often hilarious satire with the tagline “If you use this, you will get fired.” This was such a major change that I couldn’t believe it was true. I also didn’t realize that this weekend was the annual conference of the American Copy Editors Society, exactly the atmosphere required for such winds of change.

Once word had spread in my newsroom, my heart began to race. I know that’s extremely geeky and weird, but you have to understand my left pinky and ring finger have been programmed to reach the shift and w keys every time I come across “website.” That’s what style is about after all — consistency. I liken it to the beginning of every year where you have to kick yourself until you can automatically type or write in the new year. The major difference is that we’ve all become accustomed to second-guessing ourselves every January as we get used to typing in the new year. “Web site” not “website” has been ingrained in me for the past 10 years!

For many copy editor types like me, it’s not even about the style so much as it’s about resistance. And not resistance in our minds, but in our fingers. To give those nonconformists a little context here, many people were freaking out four or five years ago when “fund-raiser” became “fundraiser.” Now how ridiculous does “fund-raiser” look? Well, it used to be second nature.

I still feel on the fence about this change, but I have to admit “website” has become so colloquial there’s no stopping it. AP-style copy editors have been practically the only ones stopping it for the past several years. Poynter has a pretty good write-up of day-of reactions. I see a lot of resistance, but “website” is growing on me every time I read it. Maybe it’s the conciseness. Maybe it’s the finally-received AP sanction. I’m scaring myself a little here.

I can’t help but wonder, will Internet be “internet” someday soon? I’m already shuddering at the thought.

“The most closed-minded journalists I’ve met are the ones who just graduated.”

Las Vegas Sun new media editor Rob Curley said the above quote at a recent college media convention (I’m picking it up from Northern Illinois Newspaper Association’s blog). Apparently he shared the same observations — a bit more fleshed out — a few years ago here.

As a youngish person working at a newspaper group myself, I have had these wise words running through my head the past few days so I thought I’d write a reaction:

I graduated from college five years ago completely unprepared to work on anything that wasn’t going to be produced on dead trees. Even though I had only worked on newspapers, I still got the feeling that I was well-rounded because I had reported, edited and worked with graphics and layout. Those have definitely been skills I have needed to use on a daily basis, but it was quite naive of me to think it was close to all I needed.

We were enthusiastic about publishing our work online when I was in college, but that was the only thing we were thinking about doing online. I did not hear about the importance of photo galleries, reader comments, videos, slide shows, social media, text and e-mail alerts or any number of other new media tools until a couple of years after I graduated.

But when they did begin introducing these things at work, boy did my little communications-degreed conscience start in on the obstinacy. I initially resisted for 2 reasons:

  1. With all of the reader submissions, press release rewrites and calendar listings we had to focus on, I felt like we just weren’t taking ourselves seriously.
  2. I was not taught how to do this in J-School!

Number one is easy. Many journalists are constantly battling this catch-22. You want to be engaging. You want to deal with hard topics. Then your everyday reader shows some appreciation and loyalty for the little stuff and you write it off.

It was the first thing they applauded us for in print and it continues to be the first thing they appreciate online. You have to console yourself with the idea that they’ll continue to rely on you for spreading this information and then also be there when you’re reporting something more serious. That, and get over yourself and the idea that anything people enjoy reading leisurely can’t be taken seriously.

Number two is a much higher mountain to climb. When you’re fresh out of school, you’re setting out on a long road to unlearn the textbook examples you’ve been seeing for the past few years. There’s a disconnect between your sense of enjoyment as a content consumer and your sense of knowing what you’re doing as a content producer. The producer and consumer inside you — especially if you’ve been a good student — have to relearn how to communicate.

The producer takes a while to learn that it’s never going to be about repeating the same physical process as much as it is about keeping the same journalistic drive and mindset. Then the consumer needs to play focus group for the producer and tell him what he actually likes. And the producer has to take that seriously.

When you’ve been indoctrinated with the methods that seem to have been working, you need to be careful not to ensnare yourself. You need to integrate what you like and what’s engaged you.

We had some inspiring words on the wall in our news editing classroom about newspapers writing the first draft of history. It is so ironic that as young journalists we knowingly took that role and are sheepish about modifying the methodology ourselves along the way! We tweet, we status update, we blog, we upload photos and we comment all the time. We’ll race to communicate in whatever other forms we can develop, so there’s no need to be shy about doing it for our professional purposes as well as our personal ones.

If you wait until someone writes a book telling you to do it, that just means you’re always going to get scooped.